Image default

Can Novak Djokovic and Vasek Pospisil’s new tennis gamers’ affiliation assist enhance low pay for a lot of?

On Halloween evening 2019, the Canadian tennis participant Vasek Pospisil confronted Australian Chris O’Connell in a third-round match on the Charlottesville Males’s Professional Challenger in Virginia in america. The occasion was a part of the ATP Challenger Tour, a rung beneath the principle circuit in males’s tennis. The match had a minor-league vibe: there have been perhaps a dozen spectators, and one in all them was Pospisil’s coach. The overall purse for the week-long match was simply $US54,000, not unusual for Challenger-level occasions. The winner would get $US7200.

Pospisil, a former Wimbledon doubles champion who typically sips maple syrup for power throughout matches, was enjoying there as a part of his comeback from an harm that sidelined him for the primary half of the 2019 season. A strapping six toes 4 inches (193 centimetres), with perpetually flushed cheeks and robust thighs, Pospisil has an aggressive sport constructed round a giant first serve, a concussive forehand and a deft contact on the web. O’Connell usually performs attacking tennis himself. In opposition to Pospisil, nonetheless, he was thrust into the position of counterpuncher.

The match was a case examine in contrasting fortunes, as properly. Tennis had left Pospisil very snug, with greater than $US5 million in profession earnings. He was blissful simply to interrupt even in Charlottesville and will afford sure luxuries, such because the presence of his coach and meals from Complete Meals natural grocer, not obtainable to many gamers on the Challenger circuit. The 25-year-old O’Connell, then again, had made lower than $US200,000 as a professional and had cleaned boats and labored in a Lululemon store to maintain himself financially. Heading into the match in opposition to Pospisil, he was ranked No. 139. He had just lately gained a Challenger occasion and reached the semi-final of one other. He would go on to complete 2019 having gained 82 matches in whole, greater than every other man or lady on the professional tour. But, after bills, he would earn simply $US15,000 or so.

On that evening in Charlottesville, Pospisil prevailed 6-3, 6-2, however he got here away impressed with O’Connell’s sport – “The man is enjoying probably top-50 tennis” – and incensed that his opponent may barely scratch out a residing. “It’s loopy,” Pospisil informed me once we spoke just a few days after the match. (He ended up successful the match.) O’Connell’s monetary struggles have been an ideal illustration of a problem that Pospisil, who has been ranked as excessive as twenty fifth on the earth, believed was a menace to the way forward for tennis: the game doesn’t take enough care of its rank-and-file gamers. “In case you are not within the prime 100, you might be principally not making any cash,” Pospisil stated.

The issue, in Pospisil’s view, isn’t that Roger Federer and Serena Williams make an excessive amount of; fairly, it’s that the gamers as a bunch don’t obtain something near a fair proportion of the income generated by tennis. On the US Open, for example, prize cash quantities to round 14 per cent of gross revenues; against this, round half of the US Nationwide Basketball Affiliation’s whole revenues goes to the gamers, and the identical is roughly true in America’s Nationwide Soccer League, Nationwide Hockey League and Main League Baseball.

“There’s a lot cash in tennis,” Pospisil stated. “The pie is large; the piece we’re getting is tiny.” If the tournaments gave the gamers a much bigger minimize, he argued, the additional cash could possibly be directed to lower-level occasions. As an alternative of providing a $US54,000 purse, Charlottesville could possibly be a $US250,000 match. Pospisil stated the gamers have been being stiffed as a result of, in contrast to their friends in these different sports activities, they don’t have a union. The Affiliation of Tennis Professionals, or ATP, was initially fashioned as a gamers’ advocacy group, however at present it additionally operates the lads’s tour and has to take care of the wants of tournaments. (The Girls’s Tennis Affiliation, or WTA, is structured the identical approach.) In Pospisil’s judgment, the pursuits of the gamers have been constantly sacrificed to these of the tournaments.

When he and I had our first dialog, at Wimbledon in 2019, he was emphatic: the gamers wanted unbiased illustration. “There’s no different approach,” he stated. He had discovered a robust ally on the earth’s No. 1 participant, Novak Djokovic, who believed likewise. I met with Djokovic, too, at Wimbledon, and he stated radical change was important. “This construction is failing tennis,” he informed me.

Extra proof for his declare got here simply eight months later, when COVID-19 pressured the professional excursions to close down, plunging the game into disaster as scores of gamers who had barely scraped by in pre-pandemic instances immediately had no work. Djokovic and others tried to organise a reduction fund to which prime gamers would donate cash to assist their hard-up colleagues. It was a compassionate gesture but in addition deeply embarrassing for a sport that has lengthy projected a picture of wealth and glamour.

Quietly, Djokovic and Pospisil used the hiatus to brainstorm, and on the US Open final August, they introduced the formation of the Skilled Tennis Gamers Affiliation, or PTPA, which might negotiate on behalf of the gamers over cash, scheduling and different issues.

Looking back, the announcement was untimely: on the time, they’d no precise organisation in place. However they’ve since put collectively what now seems to be a formidable entity, helped by the backing of a trio of
billionaires: the American hedge-fund supervisor Invoice Ackman and the Canadian tycoons Anton Rabie and Rebecca MacDonald. The group has appointed Adam Larry, a Toronto lawyer beforehand with the Nationwide Hockey League Gamers Affiliation, as its govt director. It has employed attorneys, forensic accountants and a communications workers. It has a pointy web site and a emblem, and it seems to get pleasure from sturdy assist within the males’s locker room.

However though it claims to need to signify women and men, the PTPA has but to attract public assist from prime feminine gamers, a shortcoming that feels much more conspicuous within the wake of Naomi Osaka’s withdrawal from this yr’s French Open, which raised thorny questions in regards to the rights and obligations of athletes. And the fledgling organisation faces highly effective opposition – not simply from the ATP, which appears to view it as an existential menace, but in addition from the 4 grand slam tournaments: Wimbledon, the US Open, the French Open and the Australian Open, which collectively are probably the most highly effective establishments within the sport. “We’re up in opposition to an enormous machine,” Pospisil says. They’re additionally up in opposition to Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, whose
opposition to the PTPA has change into an intriguing subplot to their rivalry with Djokovic.

Debates about professional athletes and cash sometimes revolve across the highest earners and whether or not their incomes might be justified. The pandemic has confronted tennis with a really totally different query: what does a sport owe its also-rans?

Novak Djokovic of Serbia shakes hands with Vasek Pospisil of Canada after a match in England. The duo are united in their belief in a players’ union.

Novak Djokovic of Serbia shakes arms with Vasek Pospisil of Canada after a match in England. The duo are united of their perception in a gamers’ union.Credit score:Getty Pictures

The pity and puzzle of tennis are how a sport that’s so pleasing to the attention – particularly on the grass lawns at Wimbledon – has change into such a large number off the courtroom. As an alternative of a single controlling authority, for example, it has an alphabet soup of associations and federations that usually work at cross-purposes. That goes some strategy to explaining why a sport that would barely assist one males’s group competitors now has three happening in a span of 4 months.

The lads’s and ladies’s excursions function individually, and the 4 majors are unbiased from the excursions – in tennis, all of the power is centrifugal. “The game has grown like a city that didn’t have an city planner,” says the previous world No. 1, Jim Courier. Past the executive chaos, tennis is riddled with conflicts of curiosity. Administration firms that signify gamers additionally run tournaments, tv commentators moonlight as coaches, governing our bodies award contracts to firms with hyperlinks to board members.

“The game has grown like a city that didn’t have an city planner.”

What’s puzzling, too, is how a sport that has achieved perhaps as a lot as every other to advertise equality and empower athletes ended up with such a lopsided financial construction. The most important stars, like Federer and Nadal, earn tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} a yr in prize cash and, above all, endorsements. In actual fact, Federer is now apparently near turning into a billionaire. The annual Forbes listing of the world’s highest-paid feminine athletes is dominated by tennis gamers. For the non-superstars, nonetheless, tennis is way much less remunerative. Gamers are self-employed, and between journey, teaching and different bills the overhead is steep and the pay usually shockingly meagre. Many gamers lose cash pursuing their careers.

Given this set of details, it’s not laborious to see why many take into account tennis to be a sport in dire want of reform, and even revolution. Within the genial Pospisil, it has discovered an unlikely Che Guevara. Pospisil, 31, is a part of a wave of Canadian gamers, practically all of them the kids of immigrants, who’ve turned the nation right into a tennis energy. The third of three sons, Pospisil was born in 1990, two years after his dad and mom fled Czechoslovakia. The household settled in what he describes as “a small hockey city” in British Columbia’s Okanagan Valley, the place his father labored in a brewery, earlier than transferring to Vancouver in order that Pospisil may have entry to higher competitors. He turned professional when he was 17. In 2014, he gained the lads’s doubles at Wimbledon with Jack Sock, an American, as his associate. The next yr, he reached the quarter-finals in singles.

Credit score:Tara Axford

Pospisil has additionally distinguished himself along with his facet ventures. He dabbles in actual property and just lately began a mushroom firm, promoting fungi which are claimed to have particular dietary or well being advantages. “He has a love for enterprise,” says Anton Rabie, a founder and co-CEO of the Canada-based toy-and-entertainment firm Spin Grasp who has change into a mentor to Pospisil. He believes the participant has all of the qualities of a first-rate entrepreneur, together with maybe a very powerful one. “He has chutzpah,” Rabie says with amusing. Pospisil appears to be in style with sponsors. He has offers with KITS, a Canadian eyewear firm, and with the Canadian arm of Huawei, the Chinese language telecom large.

In 2018, Pospisil joined the ATP’s participant council. The 12-member group elects a number of members of the ATP’s board however in any other case serves an advisory operate, conveying the views of the gamers to the group’s executives. Pospisil grew disillusioned as he got here to know the internal workings of the ATP. He was troubled by what he noticed as overlapping pursuits. One board member, for example, was an agent for IMG, the talent-management firm that represents gamers however that additionally operates tournaments.

What particularly bothered him, although, was a way that the ATP was failing at its most simple responsibility: to advertise the curiosity of the gamers. “There’s no approach that tennis shouldn’t have 300 gamers making respectable livings,” he stated. Pospisil was aware of how a lot better middle-of-the-pack athletes in different sports activities had it. The Nationwide Hockey League was his reference level: the league had roughly 700 gamers and, in 2019, a assured minimal wage of $US700,000. Greater than half the gamers have been incomes greater than $US1 million a yr. Teaching and journey have been free, as was well being care, and gamers have been paid even once they have been out with accidents, which was not the case in tennis.

Pospisil recognised {that a} group sport may supply advantages that a person sport couldn’t. “Tennis is its personal animal,” he stated. However the share of income that the gamers obtained from the tournaments – round 17.5 per cent throughout the 2 excursions and the 4 majors – struck him as inexcusably low. Gamers have been those pulling within the followers and driving the income, and in his view they have been being exploited. And when he considered why the Three hundredth-best hockey participant was making seven figures whereas Chris O’Connell, the 139th-best tennis participant, was barely solvent, the reply was self-evident. It wasn’t as a result of NHL group homeowners have been inordinately beneficiant; it was as a result of NHL gamers had a union and tennis gamers didn’t. “It was a logical conclusion,” Pospisil stated.

Djokovic had already come to the identical conclusion. At a gamers’ assembly earlier than the 2018 Australian Open, he informed his colleagues that they wanted to think about forming their very own affiliation. On the time, Djokovic was president of the ATP participant council. However he stated that the gamers would get what they deserved from the tournaments provided that they’d illustration of their very own, separate from the ATP. Whereas quite a few gamers expressed assist for the transfer, Djokovic was accused by some within the press of being grasping, and within the days after the assembly, he appeared to disavow his personal concept. But it surely turned out to be only a momentary retreat.

After expenses, Australian Chris O’Connell cleared $US15,000 in 2019, when he won 82 matches.

After bills, Australian Chris O’Connell cleared $US15,000 in 2019, when he gained 82 matches.Credit score:AAP

Labor points gave rise to the fashionable tennis period. For a lot of their historical past, the grand slam tournaments and different competitions have been restricted to amateurs. Within the Fifties, the American Jack Kramer led an expert tour that over time attracted most of the finest gamers. Despite the fact that the amateur-only restriction was by then a farce – as a substitute of prize cash, gamers have been paid beneath the desk; “shamateurism” was the time period used to explain this state of affairs – the majors refused to permit the professionals to compete. It was, in impact, a lockout. Lastly, in 1968, the tournaments, recognising that it did tennis no good to have a few of the strongest gamers absent from probably the most prestigious occasions, opened their attracts to the professionals.

4 years later, Kramer and several other others created the ATP. It was conceived as a players-only organisation, and it wasted no time asserting itself: in 1973, gamers boycotted Wimbledon in a dispute over their proper to decide on the tournaments they participated in. “Tennis is precisely a century outdated,” Arthur Ashe, a member of the ATP’s board, wrote in his diary just a few days earlier than the vote on whether or not to play, “and this, finally, would be the second when the gamers get up for themselves.”

Participant empowerment appeared to take one other step ahead within the late Nineteen Eighties, when the ATP, now beneath the management of Hamilton Jordan, who had been Jimmy Carter’s White Home chief-of-staff, created its personal tour. From that time on, the ATP was a partnership between the gamers and the tournaments, with all sides holding three seats on the ATP’s board.

Loads of gamers assume this association has served them properly. For those who ask them why, they simply level to the expansion in prize cash. When Ashe gained the US Open in 1968, the primary yr the match supplied cash, the full purse was $US100,000 and the winner’s haul was $US14,000 (which Ashe, who was nonetheless within the military, couldn’t settle for). Lately, prize cash totals greater than $US50 million, and the female and male winners obtain just below $US4 million every (though it was much less final yr). The 128 women and men eradicated within the first spherical take residence $US61,000.


After I spoke with the veteran participant Feliciano Lopez, who’s from Spain, he expressed dismay on the notion that he and his fellow opponents have been getting a uncooked deal. “There are a lot of folks – they don’t know how this was 20 years in the past,” Lopez stated. “I used to be making $US10,000 for coming into a slam. Now I’m making $US50,000, and these folks complain? How is that doable?”

Prize cash on the 4 majors, nonetheless, has elevated principally as a result of revenues have soared. Beginning in 2013, the tournaments did conform to regularly bump up the portion going to the gamers; the US Open share, for example, has risen to 14 per cent from 11 per cent. However critics level out that the ATP, although supposedly the voice of the gamers, was not mainly chargeable for extracting these concessions. As an alternative, Federer and a few different prime gamers negotiated the will increase, and the tournaments capitulated solely within the face of a threatened boycott and the spectre of competitors: a Center Japanese investor had supplied to carry a profitable occasion similtaneously the Australian Open.

“There may be only a very large lack of transparency over match and tour funds. It’s simply a shut-up-and-play angle. ‘Shut up and play and focus in your forehands.’ ”

And the majors are only one a part of the equation. Many gamers really feel let down by their very own tour. The richest of its occasions, the 9 ATP Masters 1000 tournaments – so named as a result of the winners obtain 1000 rating factors – pay the gamers round 23 to 26 per cent of gross revenues. However the gamers don’t know the precise figures for every match as a result of that info isn’t shared with them; as a substitute, they obtain a report summarising the monetary efficiency of the 1000s as a bunch.

“There may be only a very large lack of transparency,” says the veteran American participant John Isner, who stop the ATP participant council final yr and is now backing the PTPA. In his view, the ATP didn’t need the gamers to learn and engaged. “It’s only a shut-up-and-play angle. ‘Shut up and play and focus in your forehands.’ ”

In early 2019, Djokovic and Pospisil have been a part of a profitable effort to push out the ATP chairman, Chris Kermode, who was criticised for being too deferential to the tournaments (regardless of casting a tie-breaking vote in 2014 to extend prize cash, which angered some tournaments). At Wimbledon just a few months later, a gathering of the participant council dissolved in acrimony, with 4 members resigning over Kermode’s ousting and a disputed board seat. It was a very baroque illustration of the dysfunction that plagues professional tennis.

By then, Djokovic and Pospisil have been already considering a breakaway organisation. After I spoke with Djokovic following his third-round victory at Wimbledon in 2019, he informed me the foundation of the issue was that the ATP was based mostly on an unworkable concept: that the gamers and tournaments could possibly be equal companions. He claimed that the 2 sides have been at odds “98 per cent of the time” and that as a result of the gamers have been busy with their careers and unable to
immerse themselves within the negotiating intricacies, they have been at all times in an “inferior place” when coping with the tournaments.

“I’m not complaining about something personally. However as a consultant of gamers, because the president of the participant council, I really feel that the gamers, particularly from 50 to 250 rating on the earth, deserve extra.”

However he burdened that he was not on the lookout for extra money for himself. Moderately, his goal was to assist gamers down the ranks. He stated that when he mentioned
compensation up to now, folks had “type of twisted round” his place to counsel he was grasping. “Let’s clear this up,” Djokovic stated, his voice rising.

“I’m not complaining about something personally. However as a consultant of gamers, because the president of the participant council, I really feel that the gamers, particularly from 50 to 250 rating on the earth, deserve extra.”

He was near quite a few fellow Serbs on the professional tour and was keenly conscious of how troublesome it was for them. “I understand how a lot they battle,” he stated.

Lucrative endorsement deals mean Roger Federer has become the first tennis player to be the world’s highest-paid athlete and Japan’s Naomi Osaka the world’s best-paid female athlete; female superstars like Serena Williams earn millions, yet other women players barely scrape a living together.

Profitable endorsement offers imply Roger Federer has change into the primary tennis participant to be the world’s highest-paid athlete and Japan’s Naomi Osaka the world’s best-paid feminine athlete; feminine superstars like Serena Williams earn hundreds of thousands, but different ladies gamers barely scrape a residing collectively.Credit score:Getty Pictures

Years in the past it was pretty frequent to see the winners of tennis tournaments handed large cardboard cheques, giving the impression that the game was unusually remunerative. For a handful of gamers, it has been. Final Might, as tennis was scrambling to assist its plenty, Forbes introduced that Federer was the world’s highest-paid athlete, the primary time a tennis participant had held that distinction. The week that Naomi Osaka withdrew from the French Open, it was reported that she earned $US60 million the earlier yr, probably the most ever for a feminine athlete. Numbers like that are inclined to lodge themselves within the public thoughts and feed the impression that tennis is a bonanza for everybody.

A part of the problem for the PTPA is overcoming that notion and making the case that the inequality in tennis is one thing price caring about. However even in regular, non-pandemic instances, the shortcoming of some gamers to make a
respectable residing isn’t a problem that has a lot buy on public sympathy.

After I spoke with Jim Courier some time again, he stated he empathised with these gamers however that some perspective was so as: the game nonetheless supplied loads of rewards, even when the cash wasn’t nice. “It beats working for a residing,” Courier joked, “chasing a yellow ball world wide and pretending it’s an actual job.”

Credit score:Tara Axford

And there are some in tennis who don’t consider that the revenue inequality is essentially unjust. Final spring, Dominic Thiem, world No. 3 on the time, pointedly refused to contribute to the participant reduction fund. He informed an Austrian newspaper that a number of gamers “don’t decide to the game 100 per cent. Lots of them are fairly unprofessional. I don’t see why I ought to give them cash.” (The reduction fund by no means materialised, however the 4 majors, together with the 2 excursions and the Worldwide Tennis Federation, put collectively a $US6 million reduction package deal.)

Exterior the highest 100, there’s loads of expertise and dedication; the issue is that most of the gamers lack the assets wanted to rise greater. Gaby Dabrowski, a Canadian participant who specialises in doubles, informed me that racket expertise and laborious work solely carry you thus far now. “The gamers ranked 150 to 250 are on the cusp of breaking by means of, however they want to have the ability to put money into themselves,” she stated. “You’ll be able to’t do it alone. You want a coach to information you, to have a imaginative and prescient to your tennis, to see your blind spots, and also you want cash for that.”

That was the issue she confronted, and it ended her singles profession. “I couldn’t afford a full-time coach, however I additionally couldn’t get higher with out one,” Dabrowski says. She didn’t want one for doubles, in order that turned her focus.

And life on the fringes of the professional circuit is hardly glamorous. The services are sometimes shoddy, and subsisting on instantaneous ramen in seedy motels might be soul-crushing for even probably the most resilient athlete. The American participant Noah Rubin says that melancholy is a serious downside, one which he himself has battled, and that monetary stress is a giant issue. “It’s a snowball impact,” he says. “You don’t make sufficient cash, you may’t pay for a group round you, you might be travelling to those tournaments alone, which makes it harder to succeed, which units you up for failure, which units you up for melancholy and nervousness, which doesn’t will let you play your finest tennis. It’s simply entering into a circle.”

“The gamers ranked 150 to 250 are on the cusp of breaking by means of, however they want to have the ability to put money into themselves. You’ll be able to’t do it alone. You want a coach to information you, to have a imaginative and prescient to your tennis, to see your blind spots, and also you want cash for that.”

The poor pay at low-level occasions has additionally contributed to match-fixing issues. In 2019, 26 gamers have been suspended or banned for all times for taking cash in trade for throwing matches, units and even simply particular person video games. Nearly all of the infractions occurred on the ITF Males’s World Tennis Tour, which is a stage beneath the Challenger circuit.

Pospisil and different gamers assume the ATP tournaments are additionally short-changing them. However Andrea Gaudenzi, who changed Kermode because the ATP’s chairman, disputes that. He informed me that whereas the Masters 1000 occasions do properly, a lot of the different tournaments on the ATP Tour earn solely modest income, if that, a state of affairs made worse by the pandemic. And he factors out that prize cash is only one a part of compensation. Gamers obtain free meals and lodging at ATP occasions, and the organisation affords a beneficiant pension plan.

As well as, high-ranked gamers are sometimes paid hefty look charges by tournaments. The tour has $US140 million in whole prize cash, and Gaudenzi insists that this, for the second, is the most effective the ATP can do. “The lemon has been squeezed dry,” he says.

Gaudenzi is pushing to extend tennis’s revenues over the long run – by, amongst different issues, forging nearer co-operation between the lads’s and ladies’s excursions and bundling media rights for all the large tournaments. He says it will finally assist lower-ranked gamers. “Whether or not you progress the proportion of cash from left to proper, it doesn’t actually develop the pie,” Gaudenzi says. “We need to develop the pie. If you develop the pie, you may redistribute the cash in a extra equitable and truthful approach.”


However his plan relies on some questionable assumptions. It appears fairly unlikely, for example, that the majors would conform to pool their tv rights with the 2 excursions. Past that, Gaudenzi is implicitly asking present gamers to just accept the established order, which is unacceptable to lots of them. As Pospisil places it, “Why can’t we additionally negotiate in parallel one thing that’s truthful for the gamers now?”

Tennis is brutally individualistic, and its lopsided economic system, by which nearly all of the rewards go to a choose few, inevitably makes collective motion troublesome if not unattainable. It’s a sport by which the superstars get a lot of the cash and a spotlight. The pandemic has forged a uncommon highlight on tennis’s unsung performers. The check now could be whether or not it is going to result in significant change.

Edited model of a narrative first revealed in The New York Occasions Journal. © 2021 The New York Occasions Firm

To learn extra from Good Weekend journal, go to our web page at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Brisbane Occasions.

The perfect of Good Weekend delivered to your inbox each Saturday morning. Enroll right here.

Related posts

Ladies’s Tennis Predicted to End 4th in SAC Preseason Coaches Ballot


Off and working on the Australian Open


#4 Hounds Triumph Over Crosstown Jaguars


Leave a Comment